Interesting. I was under the impression that most college athletes (well certainly the elites) don't really learn new skills in college. And I have heard that seniors tend to be replaced by underclassmen (opposite of what you see in men's gym, where 22 year old muscle development gives an advantage over 18 year olds).Not trying to make any big point...just kinda brainstorming. Also, wouldn't it be better to do the big skill the whole time and have practice at it? IOW, tolerate some lower scores early to show more difficulty later?Besides, I thought most of the college athletes had full difficulty? Certainly the sport "tops out" in a way different from men's gym.
